Rational test ordering refers to the thoughtful, evidence-based, and patient-centered use of investigations (both pathology and imaging). It aims to strike a balance between under-testing (risking missed diagnoses) and over-testing (leading to harm, stress, and unnecessary follow-ups).
Over-testing is common, with studies suggesting up to 50–75% of tests may be unnecessary.
Absolutely. Overuse of imaging (e.g., unnecessary MRIs or CTs) can lead to incidentalomas, costly follow-up, and unnecessary anxiety—without improving outcomes.
No. Rational testing isn’t about doing fewer tests; it’s about testing with intention and purpose. Every test ordered should have a clear rationale and a potential to influence clinical management.
It’s the optimal point between too few and too many tests—where clinical safety, efficiency, and patient-centered care intersect. The goal is to use clinical judgment and evidence to decide what is truly necessary.
Inbox review is a teaching tool where supervisors and registrars review recent test results together. They reflect on:
Consumer-driven healthcare, online testing services, and sensational media stories (e.g., TV health check segments) increase patient demand for unnecessary testing. Patients may present with privately ordered results, creating additional clinical burden.
Use shared decision-making. Example:
“We could do a bunch of tests, but based on what you’ve told me and your exam, I don’t think they’ll help us. Let’s monitor things and revisit if anything changes.” This builds trust and reassures patients that clinical decisions are thoughtful and safe.
Date reviewed: 19 July 2026
Please note that while reasonable care is taken to provide accurate information at the time of creation, we frequently update content and links as needed. If you identify any inconsistencies or broken links, please let us know by email.
The “trifecta” refers to the interconnectedness of clinical reasoning, the management of uncertainty, and the reduction of diagnostic error. Good reasoning and effective management of uncertainty lead to fewer errors.
No, the discussion will not focus on the management of errors after they have occurred. However, it will emphasise the importance of open discussions about errors as learning opportunities and point to resources like Medical Defence Organisation Fact Sheets.
Diagnostic error involves both failing to establish an accurate and timely diagnosis and failing to communicate that explanation effectively to the patient.
Diagnostic error is a significant issue, accounting for a substantial portion (around a third) of medical claims.
Case studies provide practical examples for registrars to analyse clinical reasoning, identify potential errors, and discuss strategies for improvement.
Supervisors can:
The main categories are:
No, diagnostic errors often result from a combination of factors. The “Swiss cheese model” illustrates how multiple factors can align to create an opportunity for error.
Cognitive biases are flawed thinking patterns that can lead to errors in judgment and decision-making.
The diagnostic pause is a brief period during the consultation where the clinician intentionally stops to reflect on the case, consider potential diagnoses, and plan the next steps.
It allows the clinician to:
Clinicians can:
ICE stands for Ideas, Concerns, and Expectations. These questions help explore the patient’s perspective:
Rational test ordering involves selecting investigations that are most likely to benefit the patient while minimizing harm and unnecessary costs.
Resources include:
Gut feelings are intuitive senses of unease or concern about a patient. They can be valuable signals that warrant further investigation or attention.
AI has the potential to assist with tasks like documentation and data analysis. However, there are concerns about its impact on clinical reasoning and the potential for bias. The RACGP recommends against using AI scribes for GPT1 registrars.
Date reviewed: 19 July 2026
Please note that while reasonable care is taken to provide accurate information at the time of creation, we frequently update content and links as needed. If you identify any inconsistencies or broken links, please let us know by email.
There are a number of areas of knowledge and skills that apply to learners in general practice at all levels. By exploring the options on this page, you will find a range of evidence-based, best practice educational tools and resources to support you in your supervision role: regardless of whether you primarily teach medical students, prevocational doctors or vocational trainees.
For clinical resources click here
For our different types of resources, please click on the relevant tab below:
| Clinical Topics Catalogue | Catalogue |
| Addiction medicine | Webinar |
| ADHD – helping your registrar deliver best practice care | Webinar, FAQ and Podcast |
| Advanced care planning | Webinar, FAQ and Podcast |
| Behavioural issues in children | Webinar, FAQ and Podcast |
| Child mental health | Webinar and Podcast |
| Chronic pain | Webinar and Podcast |
| Common infections part 1 | Webinar, FAQ and Podcast |
| Common infections part 2 | Webinar, FAQ and Podcast |
| Contraception | Webinar, FAQ and Podcast |
| Depression in Young People | Webinar and FAQ |
| Dermatology | Webinar, FAQ and Podcast |
| Dementia | Webinar 1, and 2, FAQ and Podcast Part 1 and Part 2 |
| Disability care | Webinar, FAQ and Podcast |
| Endometriosis | Webinar and FAQ |
| HIV | Webinar, FAQ and Podcast |
| LGBTQIA+ inclusive healthcare | Webinar, FAQ and Podcast |
| Long COVID | Webinar, FAQ and Podcast |
| Managing patients with a history of childhood trauma | Webinar, FAQ and Podcast |
| Men’s health | Webinar, FAQ and Podcast |
| Mental health top tips | Webinar and FAQ |
| Overweight and obesity | Webinar, FAQ and Podcast |
| Prenatal screening | Webinar, FAQ and Podcast |
| RACF care | Webinar, FAQ and Podcast |
| STIs | Webinar, FAQ and Podcast |
| Veteran’s health | Webinar, FAQ and Podcast |
| Women's Health: LARC, EMA and the AusCAPPS Network | Webinar and Podcast |
| Workers compensation | Webinar and Podcast |
| Assessing your registrar's Telehealth consultations | Webinar and FAQ |
| Behaviour change approaches for smoking cessation in general practice | Webinar part 1, Part 2 and Podcast part 1, Part 2 |
| Clinical Reasoning | Webinar |
| Consultation analysis and feedback | Webinar, FAQ and Podcast |
| Helping your registrar manage challenging patients Part 1 | Webinar, Podcast and Resources |
| Helping your registrar manage challenging patients Part 2 | Webinar, Podcast and Resources |
| Managing Uncertainty | Webinar and Podcast |
| Patient Boundaries | Webinar, FAQ and Podcast |
| Rational test ordering - helping your registrar find the 'sweet spot' | Webinar, Podcast and FAQ |
| Teaching Consultation Skills | Webinar, FAQ and Podcast |
| Teaching Professional and Ethical Practice | Webinar, FAQ and Podcast |
| Best Practice Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health - Part 1 | Webinar and Podcast |
| Best practice Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health - Part 2 | Webinar and Podcast |
| Clinical yarning | Webinar and Podcast |
| Closing the gap in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health disparity | Webinar and Podcast |
| Culturally Safe GP registrar supervision – decolonisation and a strengths-based approach | Webinar and Podcast |
| Teaching Yourself and Your Registrar About Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health | FAQ |
| Telehealth and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients | Webinar and FAQ |
| Telehealth with Aboriginal patients who are hard of hearing | FAQ |
| Best practice GP supervision – a guided tour of GPSA resources | Webinar and Podcast |
| Best practice supervision – a refresher | Webinar and Podcast |
| Clinical Supervision – Keeping Your Registrar Safe and Supported | Webinar, Resources |
| Improve safety with a ‘call for help’ list | Webinar, FAQ and Podcast |
| Introduction to GP supervision – roles, responsibilities and rewards | Webinar and FAQ |
| Managing patient complaints in general practice training – through an educational, personal and medicolegal lens | Webinar (please login to the GPSA community portal to view) |
| Orientation to GP supervision for women supervisors | Webinar, Podcast and Web Page |
| Professionalism in general practice: hard to define, important to teach | Webinar and Podcast |
| Setting boundaries when delivering good general practice care | Webinar and Podcast |
| Understanding In-Consultation Clinical and Educational Experiences of GP Registrars | Webinar Summary |
| Using the Arts in Medical Education | Webinar Summary |
| Supporting Wellbeing in GP Supervision: Looking After Yourself and Your Registrar | Webinar, Podcast and Webinar Summary |
| Alone: General Practice | Webinar, Podcast and Article |
| Are they safe in there – clinical supervision and RCA | Webinar, FAQ and Podcast |
| Teaching and Learning Priorities in the First Weeks of General Practice | Webinar, Podcast and Resources |
| The Start of the Training Term - Tips and Resources to Make the Road Less Bumpy | Webinar and Podcast |
| The (Not So) Simple Consultation | Webinar and Podcast |
| Transition to general practice: the "General Practice Survival Kit". | Webinar and Podcast |
| Ad hoc supervision and informal teaching | Webinar, FAQ and Podcast |
| Effective use of HealthPathways in clinical practice and GP training | Webinar, Podcast and FAQ |
| Engaging men in general practice | Webinar and Podcast |
| How can GP supervisors better facilitate reflective practice in their registrars? | Webinar, Podcast and FAQ |
| How to Teach Procedural Skills | Webinar, Podcast and FAQ |
| Learning planning | Webinar and FAQ |
| Making the most of in-practice teaching: tailoring learning for GP registrars | Webinar, and Podcast |
| Maximising the educational value of the ECTV | Webinar, and Podcast |
| Minimising diagnostic error – strategies to support your registrar | Webinar, Podcast and FAQ |
| Observing your registrar – refining your skills | Webinar, FAQ and Podcast |
| Problem Case Discussion - As Easy As PQRST | Webinar and Podcast |
| Study skills | Webinar and Podcast |
| Supporting GP Registrars to Manage Complexity | Webinar Summary |
| Supporting Your Registrar To Practice Evidence Based Medicine | Webinar and Podcast |
| Teaching and learning in general practice | Webinar and Podcast |
| Teaching GP Registrars to Manage Complexity | Webinar and Podcast |
| Teaching the Business of Being a GP | Webinar and Podcast |
| Video-consultation review for teaching and learning - the state of play | Webinar and Podcast |
We also recommend you visit the pages relevant to the type of your learner as a starting point.
Date reviewed: 04 August 2026
Please note that while reasonable care is taken to provide accurate information at the time of creation, we frequently update content and links as needed. If you identify any inconsistencies or broken links, please let us know by email.
This teaching plan focuses on how to approach and interpret abnormal liver function test results in general practice. It provides guidance for effective assessment, including identifying causes and planning appropriate management strategies for patients.
For convenience, you can read through this resource here, or use the pdf tools at the top of the document to download and / or print the file.
Date reviewed: 19 July 2026
Please note that while reasonable care is taken to provide accurate information at the time of creation, we frequently update content and links as needed. If you identify any inconsistencies or broken links, please let us know by email.
WHAT IS HEALTHPATHWAYS?
HealthPathways offers clinicians locally agreed information to support clinical decision-making at the point of care. It integrates clinical guidance, service and referral options, and patient resources into a single platform tailored for specific local contexts. It is a useful resource for clinical practice and GP training, and enables reflective learning, quality improvement and audit.
HOW ARE THE PATHWAYS DEVELOPED?
Community HealthPathways is developed by GPs and primary care clinicians for general practice teams. Local GP or primary care clinical editors collaborate with specialists, subject matter experts, and health system and community stakeholders to create and regularly update pathways to ensure they are practical, reflect local reality, and are evidence-based.
Local clinical editors adapt pathways to regional contexts, aligning them with referral criteria, healthcare system processes, and regional services.
Localised pathways are updated regularly. Urgent changes are flagged with “clinical editor notes” until formal reviews are completed.
WHO FUNDS AND RUNS HEALTHPATHWAYS?
In Australia, depending on the area, HealthPathways is funded and supported by state services, the Commonwealth-funded Primary Health Networks (PHNs), or a collaboration of the two. In New Zealand, it is funded and supported by Health New Zealand | Te Whatu Ora.
Streamliners host the platform, partnering with and bringing together HealthPathways Community members in Australia, New Zealand, the UK, and Canada.
Pathways can be shared across the community where appropriate, then customised for local care. Some regions also use hospital-specific pathways, Hospital HealthPathways.
Patient information, such as handouts or credible website links, is embedded into pathways to enhance consultations. This is also available at the bottom of the pathways in the patient information section.
HealthPathways provides structured guidance for consultations, refining differential diagnosis, managing rare conditions, curated resources, and insights into the local health system. It helps GPs know local, “how things are done around here” information.
Supervisors can use it for teaching and reflective learning and to identify knowledge gaps. It can support audit and quality improvement.
Information, services and resources for diverse populations, such as interpreter services and community support, enable more equitable care.
Use the “Feedback” button at the bottom right of any page to report issues, suggest improvements, or engage with your local HealthPathways team, including GP colleagues.
They can integrate it into teaching sessions, model its use during case discussions, and encourage registrars to access it regularly.
HealthPathways supports learning and is embedded in GP training to prepare trainees for assessments like the Fellowship exams.
This creates a teaching opportunity to discuss new information with supervisors, evaluate its relevance, and explore its application.
Understanding what resources registrars use, and how they are using them, ensures that registrars are relying on credible tools and using them effectively. It also allows supervisors to align teaching with those resources.
Patients benefit from high-quality, understandable information, evidence-based practices, and streamlined referrals.
A search tip is to use the “Expand All” option or Ctrl+F to find terms within a pathway.
AI assisted Smart Search allows you to navigate directly to the location on the pathway that contains the information you require. This new feature is being progressively released and will be available on all HealthPathways sites by mid-2025.
No, it complements clinical judgement and supports individualised decision-making while enhancing patient care.
Unlike general guidelines, it is tailored to GPs, integrating evidence-based recommendations with local healthcare requirements. Unlike some resources available on the internet, there is robust clinical governance over content.
It provides transparency about what information is needed for a quality referral, increasing the chance of acceptance. It also explains the referral and access criteria within the limitations of a public health system.
Sharing its benefits, demonstrating its use, and promoting frequent reference can encourage adoption.
It enables knowledge sharing and collective improvement through user feedback and updates.
Yes, the CPD reporting feature allows you to log reflective notes on pathway usage, fostering integration of reflective learning into practice. Your personal data is confidential and not shared with anyone. This feature is being progressively released and will be available on all sites by mid-2025.
Pathways also make a useful basis for an audit of your practice and for practice improvement activities.
healthpathwayscommunity.org/Home/Access-to-HealthPathways
HealthPathways is free for clinicians to use.
Date reviewed: 19 July 2026
Please note that while reasonable care is taken to provide accurate information at the time of creation, we frequently update content and links as needed. If you identify any inconsistencies or broken links, please let us know by email.
This FAQ content has been created from the webinar Empowering Neurodivergent Registrars delivered by Dr Katie Williamson click here to watch
Neurodivergent individuals, including those with ADHD and autism, bring unique strengths to medical practice. However, without adequate support, they may struggle with the demands of general practice training. They may come into general practice training with a diagnosis, or somewhere on their journey of learning more about their neurodiversity.
ADHD is a disorder of regulation. Approximately 4% of Australians under age 45 have a diagnosis of ADHD. Cognitive, physical and emotional dysregulation all feature to some degree in all people with ADHD. Doctors with ADHD often have strengths in creativity and cognitive dynamism. They may have excellent problem-solving skills and have clinical courage. In general practice, they may be excellent diagnosticians and have the capacity to manage uncertainty. However, they may struggle with overly creative lists of differential diagnoses and be prone to over-investigation.
To have been successful in medical studies with ADHD, a doctor must have a high intellect and resilience. They often have high energy, take calculated risks and exhibit attention variability. They can excel in environments where quick thinking and adaptability are required. If undiagnosed and untreated, they may struggle with executive dysfunction, time management, organisation and attention. Exam preparation can be very challenging and ultimately impact success.
Autism is a difference of communication and affects approximately 1% of Australians. Autistic people often have strengths in attention to detail, ethics, rules and heightened sensory awareness. Again, these can be very beneficial traits for diagnostic medicine and creating evidence-based management plans. Autistic doctors are deeply empathetic (emotional empathy is over-developed while cognitive empathy is reduced) with obvious benefit in the general practice environment. Evidence has shown that when appropriately supported autistic people are highly productive.
Many neurodivergent doctors face stigma, with some reluctant to disclose their diagnosis due to fear of discrimination. In those undiagnosed, stigma can lead to a blind spot in professional awareness and personal development. With the constant demands of masking in an environment with high level communication, autistic doctors are at a higher risk of burnout. Anxiety and depression are much more common in the autistic population. In a recent survey by Autistic Doctors International, as many as 77% had ever considered suicide. Autistic doctors may misunderstand hierarchy and have been labelled as demanding, or troublemakers, having only been victim of “talking truth to power”.
When discussing neurodiversity with a registrar, it’s important to approach the topic sensitively and compassionately, as neurodivergent conditions can be stigmatised. A supervisor may notice issues like executive dysfunction, anxiety, feeling overwhelmed, exam difficulties, or feedback on communication from staff or patients. Supervisors might consider raising the topic by focusing on observed concerns. Instead of making a direct diagnosis, it is helpful to ask questions about potential underlying issues and offer support to help the registrar identify possible challenges. A compassionate and understanding approach is key.
Supervisors can:
Support can include reasonable workplace accommodations such as part-time work, flexible hours, and emotional support from supervisors. Structuring training requirements, like project planning and deadlines, can help neurodivergent registrars manage their tasks. Small group learning adjustments and informing medical educators about a registrar’s condition can also provide tailored support. Consider stepping through the Autistic SPACE model. ADHD Registrars may need assistance with directing the creative process and focusing on key features of a clinical presentation rather than becoming overwhelmed with masses of details.
There are various resources available for neurodivergent doctors, including psychologists, ADHD coaches, and professional job coaching services. Additionally, support groups like Autistic Doctors International and ADHD Coaches Australasia provide valuable connections and training for neurodivergent medical professionals.
While exam formats remain the same, registrars with neurodiverse conditions may be eligible for accommodations such as extended time or breaks during exams. These adjustments can help registrars perform at their best without feeling overwhelmed.
Summary
What are the key points for medical educators and supervisors?
Date reviewed: 19 July 2026
Please note that while reasonable care is taken to provide accurate information at the time of creation, we frequently update content and links as needed. If you identify any inconsistencies or broken links, please let us know by email.
This teaching plan focuses on clinical yarning, a conversational approach that enhances communication within the consultation setting by prioritising patient-centered care and aligning with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communication preferences. By fostering successful and culturally sensitive interactions, clinical yarning equips GPs and registrars with a vital tool to deliver high-quality healthcare.
For convenience, you can read through this resource here, or use the pdf tools at the top of the document to download and / or print the file.
Date reviewed: 18 July 2026
Please note that while reasonable care is taken to provide accurate information at the time of creation, we frequently update content and links as needed. If you identify any inconsistencies or broken links, please let us know by email.
Scenario is a mobile App providing users with a library of challenging scenarios for engaging learning!
Perfect for educators and supervisors of medical students, junior doctors and GP trainees.
Where learning is all fun and games! Designed for both learners and educators in the general practice setting, this game offers an engaging and interactive way to refine your consultation skills and clinical
knowledge.
Welcome to Clinical Reasoning: the game, the fun learning resource designed to help the medical student and GP in-Training to develop their reasoning skills in the clinical setting!
Date reviewed: 20 August 2026
Please note that while reasonable care is taken to provide accurate information at the time of creation, we frequently update content and links as needed. If you identify any inconsistencies or broken links, please let us know by email.
External clinical teaching visits (ECTVs) are a key teaching and formative assessment method in Australian GP training. They are a highly valuable educational activity for registrars. As well, they act as a ‘second set of eyes’, and thus are an excellent way to review alignment between supervisor and training program assessments of a registrar’s progress.
ECTVs are a Workplace Based Assessment (WBA) activity and part of Programmatic Assessment. There has been a shift towards programmatic assessment in medical education, focussing on the importance of multiple low-stakes assessments throughout training, as opposed to a single high-stakes summative assessment at the end. WBA are core to PA, in authenticating learning and developing skills such as managing uncertainty and maintaining professionalism.
ECTVs are designed as both a teaching and assessment method, but there is a potential conflict inherent in this which needs to be carefully managed.
GPSA has developed a ‘How to…’ guide for supervisors on maximising the educational value of the ECTV. It covers five areas and is intended to be a practical guide. These areas include:
Date reviewed: 18 July 2026
Please note that while reasonable care is taken to provide accurate information at the time of creation, we frequently update content and links as needed. If you identify any inconsistencies or broken links, please let us know by email.
To effectively support and train registrars in poorly resourced environments, RVTS has identified that addressing the registrar’s professional and non-professional needs is crucial. By considering the contexts of person, place, and program, a supportive environment can be created where registrars feel comfortable, confident, competent, and have a sense of belonging and bonding with peers. This promotes effective training in challenging settings.
The Remote Vocational Training Scheme (RVTS) uses distance education and remote supervision to deliver training without requiring registrars to leave their communities. This model has proven successful over 24 years, training more than 500 doctors in 350 communities. Almost 80% of participants achieve fellowship while providing an average of 5.2 years of service in their training location.
RVTS has used multiple strategies over the years, each tailored to individual registrars and settings. However, the following have been important.
The University of Queensland recently undertook an evaluation of RVTS since its inception in 2000 and found evidence to support the effectiveness of RVTS ‘ efforts in training doctors in poorly resourced environments. This has informed the development of an evidence-based framework that includes:
The following resources are helpful:
Date reviewed: 07 August 2026
Please note that while reasonable care is taken to provide accurate information at the time of creation, we frequently update content and links as needed. If you identify any inconsistencies or broken links, please let us know by email.