FAQ: Rational Test Ordering

What is rational test ordering?

Rational test ordering refers to the thoughtful, evidence-based, and patient-centered use of investigations (both pathology and imaging). It aims to strike a balance between under-testing (risking missed diagnoses) and over-testing (leading to harm, stress, and unnecessary follow-ups).

Over-testing is common, with studies suggesting up to 50–75% of tests may be unnecessary.

Why is it important in general practice?

  • Rational test ordering:
  • Minimises unnecessary testing
  • Reduces harm from false positives
  • Preserves healthcare resources
  • Improves diagnostic accuracy

What are the harms of over-testing?

  • False positives and cascade testing
  • Increased patient anxiety
  • Physical harm from invasive follow-up procedures
  • Overdiagnosis and unnecessary treatment
  • Waste of time and healthcare resources
  • Cognitive burden on clinicians

How can over-testing specifically harm patients?

  • Psychological stress from incidental findings
  • Physical complications (e.g., biopsy-related bleeding)
  • Unnecessary referrals and interventions
  • Mislabelling with disease and long-term consequences
  • Diversion of attention from more meaningful clinical care
  • Defensive medicine and fear of missing a diagnosis
  • Patient expectations or demands
  • Time pressures and shortcuts
  • Clinical inexperience and uncertainty
  • Habitual hospital-based test ordering
  • Cognitive biases (e.g., availability bias)
  • System factors like ease of access and lack of oversight
  • Absolutely. Overuse of imaging (e.g., unnecessary MRIs or CTs) can lead to incidentalomas, costly follow-up, and unnecessary anxiety—without improving outcomes.

    No. Rational testing isn’t about doing fewer tests; it’s about testing with intention and purpose. Every test ordered should have a clear rationale and a potential to influence clinical management.

    It’s the optimal point between too few and too many tests—where clinical safety, efficiency, and patient-centered care intersect. The goal is to use clinical judgment and evidence to decide what is truly necessary.

    Yes. Common examples include:
  • Inflammatory markers (CRP/ESR) for vague symptoms like fatigue
  • Thyroid function tests in asymptomatic individuals or as routine annual screens
  • ANA without a clear indication of autoimmune disease
  • Shoulder ultrasounds in older adults
    • Prioritise history and physical examination
    • Use the ‘investigation pause’: Ask yourself, “Will this change my management?”
    • Avoid batch testing or shotgun panels
    • Start with serial testing—add on only when needed
    • Use validated guidelines and tools (e.g., HealthPathways, RCPA Manual)
    • Educate patients on the risks of over-testing

    Inbox review is a teaching tool where supervisors and registrars review recent test results together. They reflect on:

    • Why the test was ordered
    • Whether it changed management
    • Any unintended consequences It promotes critical thinking, insight, and habit change.
  • Explain your own decision-making during consults
  • Encourage open discussion around uncertainty
  • Challenge unnecessary test choices constructively
  • Share resources and tools to guide evidence-based testing
  • Show that not testing is sometimes the safer option
  • Consumer-driven healthcare, online testing services, and sensational media stories (e.g., TV health check segments) increase patient demand for unnecessary testing. Patients may present with privately ordered results, creating additional clinical burden.

    Use shared decision-making. Example:
    “We could do a bunch of tests, but based on what you’ve told me and your exam, I don’t think they’ll help us. Let’s monitor things and revisit if anything changes.” This builds trust and reassures patients that clinical decisions are thoughtful and safe.

    • Normalise uncertainty—medicine isn’t black-and-white
    • Help registrars articulate their thinking
    • Use real examples (especially ones with unintended consequences)
    • Encourage curiosity and evidence-seeking

    Date reviewed: 19 July 2026

    Please note that while reasonable care is taken to provide accurate information at the time of creation, we frequently update content and links as needed. If you identify any inconsistencies or broken links, please let us know by email.

    This website uses cookies. Read our privacy policy.

    FAQ: Minimising diagnostic error – strategies to support your registrar

    What is the “trifecta” of skills?

    The “trifecta” refers to the interconnectedness of clinical reasoning, the management of uncertainty, and the reduction of diagnostic error. Good reasoning and effective management of uncertainty lead to fewer errors.

    Will the discussion cover how to manage errors after they occur?

    No, the discussion will not focus on the management of errors after they have occurred. However, it will emphasise the importance of open discussions about errors as learning opportunities and point to resources like Medical Defence Organisation Fact Sheets.

    What is diagnostic error?

    Diagnostic error involves both failing to establish an accurate and timely diagnosis and failing to communicate that explanation effectively to the patient.

    How common is diagnostic error in medical practice?

    Diagnostic error is a significant issue, accounting for a substantial portion (around a third) of medical claims.

    How can case studies be used in teaching registrars?

    Case studies provide practical examples for registrars to analyse clinical reasoning, identify potential errors, and discuss strategies for improvement.

     Supervisors can:

    • Facilitate discussions about clinical reasoning and diagnostic error.
    • Use case studies to analyse decision-making.
    • Encourage reflection on clinical encounters.
    • Provide feedback on performance.
    • Create a safe environment for discussing errors and uncertainty.

    The main categories are:

  • Presentation factors (how the illness presents)
  • Undifferentiated illness (early, vague symptoms)
  • Atypical presentations of common diseases
  • Rare conditions
  • Patient factors
  • Difficulty communicating
  • Complex medical histories
  • Non-compliance with investigations or treatment
  • Self-labeling or misattributing symptoms
  • Inadequate follow-up.
  • Patient delays in seeking further care.
  • Doctor factors
  • Lack of knowledge or experience
  • Cognitive biases (e.g., confirmation bias, overconfidence bias)
  • Communication barriers
  • Time pressure and fatigue
  • “HALT” factors (Hungry, Angry, Late, Tired) System factors
  • Issues with appointment scheduling and access
  • Inadequate record-keeping systems
  • Lack of follow-up and recall systems
  • Walk-in or urgent care settings that disrupt continuity of care
  • No, diagnostic errors often result from a combination of factors. The “Swiss cheese model” illustrates how multiple factors can align to create an opportunity for error.

    Cognitive biases are flawed thinking patterns that can lead to errors in judgment and decision-making.

    • Confirmation bias: Seeking or interpreting information that confirms existing beliefs.
    • Overconfidence bias: Overestimating one’s own knowledge or abilities.
    • Availability heuristic: Overemphasizing recent or memorable cases.
    • Anchoring bias: Fixating on initial information and failing to adjust appropriately.
    • Awareness: Recognizing and acknowledging one’s own biases.
    • Metacognition: Thinking about one’s own thinking process.
    • Seeking diverse perspectives: Consulting with colleagues or considering alternative explanations.
    • Using decision support tools: Checklists, guidelines, and algorithms can help mitigate bias.

    The diagnostic pause is a brief period during the consultation where the clinician intentionally stops to reflect on the case, consider potential diagnoses, and plan the next steps.

    It allows the clinician to:

    • Organise their thoughts.
    • Identify potential biases.
    • Consider alternative diagnoses.
    • Avoid premature closure.
    • Formulate a safe and effective management plan.

    Clinicians can:

    • Take a few moments to think and make notes.
    • Use phrases like, “Let me just think about this for a moment.”
    • Explain to the patient that they are taking time to consider the case carefully.

    ICE stands for Ideas, Concerns, and Expectations. These questions help explore the patient’s perspective:

    • Ideas: What do you think might be causing your symptoms?
    • Concerns: What are you most worried about?
    • Expectations: What are you hoping we can achieve today?

    Rational test ordering involves selecting investigations that are most likely to benefit the patient while minimizing harm and unnecessary costs.

    Resources include:

    • Clinical guidelines (e.g., Therapeutic Guidelines, Health Pathways)
    • The BMJ paper on how GPs diagnose
    • The RACGP Clinical Reasoning Guide

    Gut feelings are intuitive senses of unease or concern about a patient. They can be valuable signals that warrant further investigation or attention.

    These include:
  • Thorough history and examination.
  • Appropriate use of investigations.
  • Seeking second opinions.
  • Open communication with patients.
  • Reflective practice.
  • Seeking help from colleagues or specialists.
  • Using checklists.
  • Effective communication with patients.
  • Utilising recall and reminder systems.
  • Keeping a personal notebook for tracking patients.
  • Employing safety netting techniques.
  • AI has the potential to assist with tasks like documentation and data analysis. However, there are concerns about its impact on clinical reasoning and the potential for bias. The RACGP recommends against using AI scribes for GPT1 registrars.

    Date reviewed: 19 July 2026

    Please note that while reasonable care is taken to provide accurate information at the time of creation, we frequently update content and links as needed. If you identify any inconsistencies or broken links, please let us know by email.

    This website uses cookies. Read our privacy policy.

    Supervision resources for all types of learners

    There are a number of areas of knowledge and skills that apply to learners in general practice at all levels. By exploring the options on this page, you will find a range of evidence-based, best practice educational tools and resources to support you in your supervision role: regardless of whether you primarily teach medical students, prevocational doctors or vocational trainees.

    For clinical resources click here 

    For our different types of resources, please click on the relevant tab below:

    Clinical Topics CatalogueCatalogue
    Addiction medicineWebinar
    ADHD – helping your registrar deliver best practice careWebinar, FAQ and Podcast
    Advanced care planningWebinar, FAQ and Podcast
    Behavioural issues in childrenWebinar, FAQ and Podcast
    Child mental healthWebinar and Podcast
    Chronic painWebinar and Podcast
    Common infections part 1Webinar, FAQ and Podcast
    Common infections part 2Webinar, FAQ and Podcast
    ContraceptionWebinar, FAQ and Podcast
    Depression in Young PeopleWebinar and FAQ
    DermatologyWebinar, FAQ and Podcast
    DementiaWebinar 1, and 2, FAQ and Podcast Part 1 and Part 2
    Disability careWebinar, FAQ and Podcast
    EndometriosisWebinar and FAQ
    HIVWebinar, FAQ and Podcast
    LGBTQIA+ inclusive healthcareWebinar, FAQ and Podcast
    Long COVIDWebinar, FAQ and Podcast
    Managing patients with a history of childhood traumaWebinar, FAQ and Podcast
    Men’s healthWebinar, FAQ and Podcast
    Mental health top tipsWebinar and FAQ
    Overweight and obesityWebinar, FAQ and Podcast
    Prenatal screeningWebinar, FAQ and Podcast
    RACF careWebinar, FAQ and Podcast
    STIsWebinar, FAQ and Podcast
    Veteran’s healthWebinar, FAQ and Podcast
    Women's Health: LARC, EMA and the AusCAPPS NetworkWebinar and Podcast
    Workers compensationWebinar and Podcast
    Assessing your registrar's Telehealth consultationsWebinar and FAQ
    Behaviour change approaches for smoking cessation in general practiceWebinar part 1, Part 2 and Podcast part 1, Part 2
    Clinical ReasoningWebinar
    Consultation analysis and feedback
    Webinar, FAQ and Podcast
    Helping your registrar manage challenging patients Part 1Webinar, Podcast and Resources
    Helping your registrar manage challenging patients Part 2Webinar, Podcast and Resources
    Managing UncertaintyWebinar and Podcast
    Patient BoundariesWebinar, FAQ and Podcast
    Rational test ordering - helping your registrar find the 'sweet spot'Webinar, Podcast and FAQ
    Teaching Consultation Skills
    Webinar, FAQ and Podcast
    Teaching Professional and Ethical PracticeWebinar, FAQ and Podcast
    Best Practice Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health - Part 1Webinar and Podcast
    Best practice Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health - Part 2Webinar and Podcast
    Clinical yarningWebinar and Podcast
    Closing the gap in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health disparityWebinar and Podcast
    Culturally Safe GP registrar supervision – decolonisation and a strengths-based approachWebinar and Podcast
    Teaching Yourself and Your Registrar About Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander HealthFAQ
    Telehealth and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patientsWebinar and FAQ
    Telehealth with Aboriginal patients who are hard of hearingFAQ
    Best practice GP supervision – a guided tour of GPSA resources
    Webinar and Podcast
    Best practice supervision – a refresherWebinar and Podcast
    Clinical Supervision – Keeping Your Registrar Safe and SupportedWebinar, Resources
    Improve safety with a ‘call for help’ listWebinar, FAQ and Podcast
    Introduction to GP supervision – roles, responsibilities and rewardsWebinar and FAQ
    Managing patient complaints in general practice training – through an educational, personal and medicolegal lensWebinar (please login to the GPSA community portal to view)
    Orientation to GP supervision for women supervisorsWebinar, Podcast and Web Page
    Professionalism in general practice: hard to define, important to teach
    Webinar and Podcast
    Setting boundaries when delivering good general practice careWebinar and Podcast
    Understanding In-Consultation Clinical and Educational Experiences of GP RegistrarsWebinar Summary
    Using the Arts in Medical Education
    Webinar Summary
    Supporting Wellbeing in GP Supervision: Looking After Yourself and Your RegistrarWebinar, Podcast and Webinar Summary
    Alone: General PracticeWebinar, Podcast and Article
    Are they safe in there – clinical supervision and RCAWebinar, FAQ and Podcast
    Teaching and Learning Priorities in the First Weeks of General PracticeWebinar, Podcast and Resources
    The Start of the Training Term - Tips and Resources to Make the Road Less BumpyWebinar and Podcast
    The (Not So) Simple ConsultationWebinar and Podcast
    Transition to general practice: the "General Practice Survival Kit".Webinar and Podcast
    Empowering Neurodivergent RegistrarsWebinar, Podcast and FAQ
    Supporting the International Medical Graduate (IMG) GP Registrar
    Webinar and Podcast
    ACRRM Training and Supervision UpdateWebinar and Podcast
    Remote supervision – better access to care for rural and remote communitiesWebinar and Podcast
    Training in Poorly Resourced EnvironmentsWebinar, Podcast and FAQ
    Ad hoc supervision and informal teachingWebinar, FAQ and Podcast
    Effective use of HealthPathways in clinical practice and GP trainingWebinar, Podcast and FAQ
    Engaging men in general practiceWebinar and Podcast
    How can GP supervisors better facilitate reflective practice in their registrars?Webinar, Podcast and FAQ
    How to Teach Procedural SkillsWebinar, Podcast and FAQ
    Learning planningWebinar and FAQ
    Making the most of in-practice teaching: tailoring learning for GP registrarsWebinar, and Podcast
    Maximising the educational value of the ECTVWebinar, and Podcast
    Minimising diagnostic error – strategies to support your registrarWebinar, Podcast and FAQ
    Observing your registrar – refining your skillsWebinar, FAQ and Podcast
    Problem Case Discussion - As Easy As PQRSTWebinar and Podcast
    Study skillsWebinar and Podcast
    Supporting GP Registrars to Manage ComplexityWebinar Summary
    Supporting Your Registrar To Practice Evidence Based MedicineWebinar and Podcast
    Teaching and learning in general practiceWebinar and Podcast
    Teaching GP Registrars to Manage ComplexityWebinar and Podcast
    Teaching the Business of Being a GPWebinar and Podcast
    Video-consultation review for teaching and learning - the state of playWebinar and Podcast
    Consultation analysis and feedbackWebinar, FAQ and Podcast
    Early Identification of the Registrar in DifficultyWebinar and Podcast
    How to give feedback the DR STABLE WayWebinar and Podcast

    We also recommend you visit the pages relevant to the type of your learner as a starting point.

    Button Example

    Date reviewed: 04 August 2026

    Please note that while reasonable care is taken to provide accurate information at the time of creation, we frequently update content and links as needed. If you identify any inconsistencies or broken links, please let us know by email.

    This website uses cookies. Read our privacy policy.

    Teaching Plan: Abnormal Liver Function Tests

    This teaching plan focuses on how to approach and interpret abnormal liver function test results in general practice. It provides guidance for effective assessment, including identifying causes and planning appropriate management strategies for patients.

    For convenience, you can read through this resource here, or use the pdf tools at the top of the document to download and / or print the file.

     

     

    Date reviewed: 19 July 2026

    Please note that while reasonable care is taken to provide accurate information at the time of creation, we frequently update content and links as needed. If you identify any inconsistencies or broken links, please let us know by email.

    This website uses cookies. Read our privacy policy.

    FAQ: Effective use of HealthPathways
    in clinical practice and GP training

    WHAT IS HEALTHPATHWAYS?
    HealthPathways offers clinicians locally agreed information to support clinical decision-making at the point of care. It integrates clinical guidance, service and referral options, and patient resources into a single platform tailored for specific local contexts. It is a useful resource for clinical practice and GP training, and enables reflective learning, quality improvement and audit.

    HOW ARE THE PATHWAYS DEVELOPED?
    Community HealthPathways is developed by GPs and primary care clinicians for general practice teams. Local GP or primary care clinical editors collaborate with specialists, subject matter experts, and health system and community stakeholders to create and regularly update pathways to ensure they are practical, reflect local reality, and are evidence-based.

    Local clinical editors adapt pathways to regional contexts, aligning them with referral criteria, healthcare system processes, and regional services.

    Localised pathways are updated regularly. Urgent changes are flagged with “clinical editor notes” until formal reviews are completed.

    WHO FUNDS AND RUNS HEALTHPATHWAYS?
    In Australia, depending on the area, HealthPathways is funded and supported by state services, the Commonwealth-funded Primary Health Networks (PHNs), or a collaboration of the two. In New Zealand, it is funded and supported by Health New Zealand | Te Whatu Ora.

    Streamliners host the platform, partnering with and bringing together HealthPathways Community members in Australia, New Zealand, the UK, and Canada.

    Pathways can be shared across the community where appropriate, then customised for local care. Some regions also use hospital-specific pathways, Hospital HealthPathways.

    1. Clinical Pathways: Assessment, management, and referral guidance for conditions. It includes both presentation-based pathways for undifferentiated conditions e.g. headaches or eye problems in children, alongside condition-based pathways e.g. diabetes.
    2. Request Pathways: Information for access and referral to local services.
    3. Resource Pages: Supplementary materials, including medication guides, infection control protocols, and health system information e.g. MBS claim.

    Patient information, such as handouts or credible website links, is embedded into pathways to enhance consultations. This is also available at the bottom of the pathways in the patient information section.

    HealthPathways provides structured guidance for consultations, refining differential diagnosis, managing rare conditions, curated resources, and insights into the local health system. It helps GPs know local, “how things are done around here” information.

    Supervisors can use it for teaching and reflective learning and to identify knowledge gaps. It can support audit and quality improvement.

    Information, services and resources for diverse populations, such as interpreter services and community support, enable more equitable care.

    Use the “Feedback” button at the bottom right of any page to report issues, suggest improvements, or engage with your local HealthPathways team, including GP colleagues.

    They can integrate it into teaching sessions, model its use during case discussions, and encourage registrars to access it regularly.

    HealthPathways supports learning and is embedded in GP training to prepare trainees for assessments like the Fellowship exams.

    This creates a teaching opportunity to discuss new information with supervisors, evaluate its relevance, and explore its application.

    Understanding what resources registrars use, and how they are using them, ensures that registrars are relying on credible tools and using them effectively. It also allows supervisors to align teaching with those resources.

    Patients benefit from high-quality, understandable information, evidence-based practices, and streamlined referrals.

    A search tip is to use the “Expand All” option or Ctrl+F to find terms within a pathway.

    AI assisted Smart Search allows you to navigate directly to the location on the pathway that contains the information you require. This new feature is being progressively released and will be available on all HealthPathways sites by mid-2025.

    No, it complements clinical judgement and supports individualised decision-making while enhancing patient care.

    Unlike general guidelines, it is tailored to GPs, integrating evidence-based recommendations with local healthcare requirements. Unlike some resources available on the internet, there is robust clinical governance over content.

    It provides transparency about what information is needed for a quality referral, increasing the chance of acceptance. It also explains the referral and access criteria within the limitations of a public health system.

    Sharing its benefits, demonstrating its use, and promoting frequent reference can encourage adoption.

    It enables knowledge sharing and collective improvement through user feedback and updates.

    Yes, the CPD reporting feature allows you to log reflective notes on pathway usage, fostering integration of reflective learning into practice. Your personal data is confidential and not shared with anyone. This feature is being progressively released and will be available on all sites by mid-2025.

    Pathways also make a useful basis for an audit of your practice and for practice improvement activities.

    healthpathwayscommunity.org/Home/Access-to-HealthPathways

    HealthPathways is free for clinicians to use.

    Date reviewed: 19 July 2026

    Please note that while reasonable care is taken to provide accurate information at the time of creation, we frequently update content and links as needed. If you identify any inconsistencies or broken links, please let us know by email.

    This website uses cookies. Read our privacy policy.

    FAQ Empowering Neurodivergent Registrars

    This FAQ content has been created from the webinar Empowering Neurodivergent Registrars delivered by Dr Katie Williamson click here to watch

    Neurodiversity in General Practice

    Neurodivergent individuals, including those with ADHD and autism, bring unique strengths to medical practice. However, without adequate support, they may struggle with the demands of general practice training. They may come into general practice training with a diagnosis, or somewhere on their journey of learning more about their neurodiversity.

    ADHD is a disorder of regulation. Approximately 4% of Australians under age 45 have a diagnosis of ADHD. Cognitive, physical and emotional dysregulation all feature to some degree in all people with ADHD. Doctors with ADHD often have strengths in creativity and cognitive dynamism. They may have excellent problem-solving skills and have clinical courage. In general practice, they may be excellent diagnosticians and have the capacity to manage uncertainty. However, they may struggle with overly creative lists of differential diagnoses and be prone to over-investigation.

    To have been successful in medical studies with ADHD, a doctor must have a high intellect and resilience. They often have high energy, take calculated risks and exhibit attention variability. They can excel in environments where quick thinking and adaptability are required. If undiagnosed and untreated, they may struggle with executive dysfunction, time management, organisation and attention. Exam preparation can be very challenging and ultimately impact success.

    Autism is a difference of communication and affects approximately 1% of Australians. Autistic people often have strengths in attention to detail, ethics, rules and heightened sensory awareness. Again, these can be very beneficial traits for diagnostic medicine and creating evidence-based management plans. Autistic doctors are deeply empathetic (emotional empathy is over-developed while cognitive empathy is reduced) with obvious benefit in the general practice environment. Evidence has shown that when appropriately supported autistic people are highly productive.

    Many neurodivergent doctors face stigma, with some reluctant to disclose their diagnosis due to fear of discrimination. In those undiagnosed, stigma can lead to a blind spot in professional awareness and personal development. With the constant demands of masking in an environment with high level communication, autistic doctors are at a higher risk of burnout. Anxiety and depression are much more common in the autistic population. In a recent survey by Autistic Doctors International, as many as 77% had ever considered suicide. Autistic doctors may misunderstand hierarchy and have been labelled as demanding, or troublemakers, having only been victim of “talking truth to power”.

    When discussing neurodiversity with a registrar, it’s important to approach the topic sensitively and compassionately, as neurodivergent conditions can be stigmatised. A supervisor may notice issues like executive dysfunction, anxiety, feeling overwhelmed, exam difficulties, or feedback on communication from staff or patients. Supervisors might consider raising the topic by focusing on observed concerns. Instead of making a direct diagnosis, it is helpful to ask questions about potential underlying issues and offer support to help the registrar identify possible challenges. A compassionate and understanding approach is key.

    Supervisors can:

    • Offer personalised accommodations for learning
    • Be aware of and sensitive to the needs of neurodivergent registrars
    • Focus on strengths and provide practical support to address challenges
    • Foster a supportive, inclusive work environment that recognises the value of neurodiversity.

    Support can include reasonable workplace accommodations such as part-time work, flexible hours, and emotional support from supervisors. Structuring training requirements, like project planning and deadlines, can help neurodivergent registrars manage their tasks. Small group learning adjustments and informing medical educators about a registrar’s condition can also provide tailored support. Consider stepping through the Autistic SPACE model. ADHD Registrars may need assistance with directing the creative process and focusing on key features of a clinical presentation rather than becoming overwhelmed with masses of details.

    There are various resources available for neurodivergent doctors, including psychologists, ADHD coaches, and professional job coaching services. Additionally, support groups like Autistic Doctors International and ADHD Coaches Australasia provide valuable connections and training for neurodivergent medical professionals.

    While exam formats remain the same, registrars with neurodiverse conditions may be eligible for accommodations such as extended time or breaks during exams. These adjustments can help registrars perform at their best without feeling overwhelmed.

    Summary
    What are the key points for medical educators and supervisors?

    • The importance of adapting teaching and supervision methods to support neurodivergent registrars.
    • A strengths-based approach that values the unique qualities neurodivergent doctors bring to the profession.

    Date reviewed: 19 July 2026

    Please note that while reasonable care is taken to provide accurate information at the time of creation, we frequently update content and links as needed. If you identify any inconsistencies or broken links, please let us know by email.

    This website uses cookies. Read our privacy policy.

    Teaching Plan: Clinical Yarning

    This teaching plan focuses on clinical yarning, a conversational approach that enhances communication within the consultation setting by prioritising patient-centered care and aligning with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communication preferences. By fostering successful and culturally sensitive interactions, clinical yarning equips GPs and registrars with a vital tool to deliver high-quality healthcare.

    For convenience, you can read through this resource here, or use the pdf tools at the top of the document to download and / or print the file. 

    Date reviewed: 18 July 2026

    Please note that while reasonable care is taken to provide accurate information at the time of creation, we frequently update content and links as needed. If you identify any inconsistencies or broken links, please let us know by email.

    This website uses cookies. Read our privacy policy.

    SCENARIO

    Scenario is a mobile App providing users with a library of challenging scenarios for engaging learning!

    Perfect for educators and supervisors of medical students, junior doctors and GP trainees.

    Click here for more information

    Games

    Consultation! The Board Game

    Where learning is all fun and games! Designed for both learners and educators in the general practice setting, this game offers an engaging and interactive way to refine your consultation skills and clinical
    knowledge.

    Click here for more information

    Clinical Reasoning: the game

    Welcome to Clinical Reasoning: the game, the fun learning resource designed to help the medical student and GP in-Training to develop their reasoning skills in the clinical setting!

    Play now online

    Date reviewed: 20 August 2026

    Please note that while reasonable care is taken to provide accurate information at the time of creation, we frequently update content and links as needed. If you identify any inconsistencies or broken links, please let us know by email.

    This website uses cookies. Read our privacy policy.

    Maximising the educational value of the ECTV FAQ

    What is the ECTV?

    External clinical teaching visits (ECTVs) are a key teaching and formative assessment method in Australian GP training. They are a highly valuable educational activity for registrars. As well, they act as a ‘second set of eyes’, and thus are an excellent way to review alignment between supervisor and training program assessments of a registrar’s progress.

    What is Programmatic Assessment (PA) and Workplace-Based Assessments (WBA)?

    ECTVs are a Workplace Based Assessment (WBA) activity and part of Programmatic Assessment. There has been a shift towards programmatic assessment in medical education, focussing on the importance of multiple low-stakes assessments throughout training, as opposed to a single high-stakes summative assessment at the end. WBA are core to PA, in authenticating learning and developing skills such as managing uncertainty and maintaining professionalism.

    Is the purpose of the ECTV teaching or assessment?

    ECTVs are designed as both a teaching and assessment method, but there is a potential conflict inherent in this which needs to be carefully managed.

    How can the educational value of the ECTV be enhanced?

    GPSA has developed a ‘How to…’ guide for supervisors on maximising the educational value of the ECTV. It covers five areas and is intended to be a practical guide. These areas include:

    • Planning for the visit
    • Interacting with the teaching visitor
    • Reviewing the ECTV report
    • Discussion with the registrar
    • Follow-up

    Date reviewed: 18 July 2026

    Please note that while reasonable care is taken to provide accurate information at the time of creation, we frequently update content and links as needed. If you identify any inconsistencies or broken links, please let us know by email.

    This website uses cookies. Read our privacy policy.

    Supporting and Training Registrars in Poorly Resourced Environments

    How is it possible to effectively support and train registrars in poorly resourced environments?

    To effectively support and train registrars in poorly resourced environments, RVTS has identified that addressing the registrar’s professional and non-professional needs is crucial. By considering the contexts of person, place, and program, a supportive environment can be created where registrars feel comfortable, confident, competent, and have a sense of belonging and bonding with peers. This promotes effective training in challenging settings.

    The Remote Vocational Training Scheme (RVTS) uses distance education and remote supervision to deliver training without requiring registrars to leave their communities. This model has proven successful over 24 years, training more than 500 doctors in 350 communities. Almost 80% of participants achieve fellowship while providing an average of 5.2 years of service in their training location.

    Three key take-home points:

    1. Training registrars in resource-poor environments involves more than providing remote supervision; a holistic professional support package must be in place for success.
    2. It’s not for everybody. Training in poorly resourced environments requires resilience and resourcefulness and is better suited to more experienced doctors.
    3. Family support as part of the training package is highly valued.

    What strategies can be implemented to support registrars in poorly resourced environments?

    RVTS has used multiple strategies over the years, each tailored to individual registrars and settings. However, the following have been important.

    • Regular Contact and Supervision: Frequent interactions with supervisors and medical educators through phone calls, emails, and visits ensure continuous support and guidance. RVTS employs a structured supervision schedule with initial frequent contacts tapering over time as registrars become more confident and experienced.
    • Flexible Approach: Adopting a flexible training approach to account for the varied situations faced by remote doctors is crucial. This involves tailoring supervision and support to meet individual needs and circumstances.
    • Face-to-Face Meetings: Organising regular face-to-face meetings to build group cohesiveness and update essential skills, especially in emergency medicine. RVTS schedules workshops twice a year, which also include social events to foster building a network and community.
    • Collegial and Peer Support: Encouraging peer interactions through weekly teletutorials, WhatsApp groups, and peer study groups, fostering a sense of belonging to a special group.
    • Family Support: Incorporating family support in the training package, such as enabling families to attend workshops, significantly contributes to retention and well-being.
    • Simple Technology Solutions: Using straightforward technology solutions such as phone, email, web-based resources, and Zoom/Teams meetings.to avoid the need for on-site technical support.

    What is an evidence-based framework for supporting registrars in poorly resourced environments, and how can I apply it?

    The University of Queensland recently undertook an evaluation of RVTS since its inception in 2000 and found evidence to support the effectiveness of RVTS ‘ efforts in training doctors in poorly resourced environments. This has informed the development of an evidence-based framework that includes:

    • Personalised Support: Tailored education and personal support from supervisors, many of whom are former registrars familiar with the local context. These supervisors serve as independent longitudinal mentors throughout the training, providing continuous, unbiased, and empathetic guidance that is relevant to the specific challenges faced by registrars.
    • The provision of holistic professional support that promotes comfort, confidence, competency, belonging, and professional bonding (the “3Cs and 2Bs”) among the registrars.
    • Continuity of Care: Provides consistent, quality care tailored to community needs in low-resource areas. This fosters…
    • Community Trust: Doctors’ longer tenure builds patient trust and deeper learning. RVTS Doctors spend an average of 5.2 years in the same practice, fostering stability.

    To effectively apply this framework:

    • Consider the registrar as a whole person by recognising the educational and psychosocial needs of registrars.
    • Encourage registrars to stay in the same practice for stability and community integration.
    • Implement supervision models that ensure independent, structured, unbiased, and continuous support throughout training.
    • Tailor training to the registrar’s specific work environment.
    • Foster community building through social and professional networks.

    Date reviewed: 07 August 2026

    Please note that while reasonable care is taken to provide accurate information at the time of creation, we frequently update content and links as needed. If you identify any inconsistencies or broken links, please let us know by email.

    This website uses cookies. Read our privacy policy.